I have not had a chance to view the Woodward "60 Minutes" segment, but I have a question: how is it such a celebrated journalist as Woodward, who is supposedly adept at uncovering the truth, writes a 400-page book about Bush and 9-11 ("Bush At War") and after interviewing over 100 sources, is not able to come up with any of the earth-shattering revelations that now form the basis for his second book? Did he come across much of this stuff while researching the first Bush book and said to himself, "oh boy, I have a juicy second book all set for election year -- yippee!"....? It makes you wonder.