There is no such thing as an ironclad “executive privilege” doctrine that can shield Bush, or any other president, from congressional subpoenas. And that’s not surprising, since the Constitution never mentions one. Indeed, in 1974, when Nixon tried to invoke “executive privilege” as a way to shield the secret tapes of his conversations with aides, the U.S. Supreme Court – chaired at the time by one of Nixon’s own appointees – unanimously ruled that “absent a claim of need to protect military, diplomatic, or sensitive national security secrets,” a president is on weak ground.All the more reason for the Dems to ignore yesterday's Washington Post editorial and settle for nothing less than under oath testimony.
Friday, March 23, 2007
Dick Polman writes:
Posted by Grey Matter at 7:07 AM